The Science Fiction Review Books,Movies I, Robot – The Illustrated Screenplay by Harlan Ellison

I, Robot – The Illustrated Screenplay by Harlan Ellison

It has been almost 4 years since the movie I, Robot (2004) was released. I was terribly disappointed that the Hollywood movie was barely anything like the book of short stories that I remembered reading, which I explained in my review. After browsing the Internet looking for other reactions I discovered that a screenplay written by Harlan Ellison had received a glowing review from Isaac Asimov.

–edit– 4-16-2008
I just ran across this interesting NPR story from 2004 that talks about the fan reaction to the original I, Robot movie. There are a few comments from Harlan Ellison and Irving Kirchner, director of The Empire Strikes Back, as one the prospective directors. The audio story is available in Real Media and Windows Media Player formats.
–edit–

The Illustrated Screenplay is preceded by a letter from Asimov detailing his thoughts about how none of his science fiction had made it to the silver screen. He points out that he wrote the novelization for Fantastic Voyage was based on a script that took so long to finish filming that the book came out six months before the movie. I always enjoy reading Asimov’s commentary on other people’s work, especially in the Robot City series.

Next, Harlan Ellison gives us a brief background of the history behind the events surrounding the script for I, Robot that was never made into a movie. Ellison writes this with a very frank manner which I found intriguing. He made me feel the disgust that he felt after the script was finally shelved. After reading the script my feelings were even stronger.

This script succeeded in doing what the 2004 version failed to do, stay true to Isaac Asimov’s vision. Asimov identified four stories that Ellison incorporated into this screenplay, but I’ve identified five; Robbie, Runaround, Liar!, Evidence, and The Evitable Conflict. Several of these stories are covered almost exactly, while others are modified to insert Susan Calvin into them as she is the main focus of the screenplay.

I was pleased to see that Calvin was much as Asimov envisioned, not the sexy Bridget Moynahan that Hollywood insisted on. If I want to watch an action movie with a hot actress, there are plenty others to choose from. While a majority of the elements come directly from Asimov’s writing, there are many aspects to this screenplay that are unique. The main two differences are that there are aliens allied with humans in a Galactic Federation and teleportation is the primary mode of space travel.

This screenplay is not a fluffed up and full of action, but an adult oriented Sci-Fi drama. There are adult themes and situations, philosophical discussions, and harsh language. This movie would probably get by with a PG-13 rating today, but would likely have been rated R because of a few scenes back in 1978 when it was finalized. This was a truly enjoyable read, and any fan of Isaac Asimov should make it a point to read it.

2 thoughts on “I, Robot – The Illustrated Screenplay by Harlan Ellison”

  1. I find it interesting that many people moan about a project as being a piece of garbage, but they still manage to make a half billion dollars at the box office. The general public are not extremely intelligent, for if they were a fantastic screenplay like Ellison’s would find favor at the studios and be greenlit. If you want to view films based on great speculative fiction, don’t look to Columbia, Paramount et al. Most of these companies are run by agents putting together package deals. Luckily they haven’t jumped on a great novel like Stranger in a Strange Land. I hear Universal has Justin Beiber in mind for Valentine Micheal Smith!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please prove you are a human * Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Post

Isaac Asimov would have been 90 todayIsaac Asimov would have been 90 today

Nobody is sure when exactly Isaac Asimov was born due to poor record keeping. January 2nd, 1920 was the day Isaac Asimov decided to celebrate his birthday. Along with creating the Three Laws of Robotics, Asimov also unintentionally coined the term robotics. It was first used in print when his short story “Liar!” was published in 1941. He was constantly writing in just about every area of literature. I have primarily read his Science Fiction, but he has done textbooks, humor, mystery, non-fiction, and more.

My first exposure to Asimov’s writing was when my father gave me an old worn out copy of I, Robot. I tucked the book away for a few years and eventually got around to reading it. I was so enthralled with the robots that I eventually read every robot book by him and other authors. This naturally led me to read the Foundation series which I also enjoyed, but I’ve always preferred the robot series. The Robot and Foundation books make up the biggest reading project I have ever completed. Aside from those, I’ve read a bit of his autobiography and plan on sampling some of his other writing in the near future.

By the time I discovered Asimov, he had already died. I wonder how much more he could have written had he not contracted HIV from a blood transfusion he received during heart surgery. He died of myocardial and renal complications on April 6, 1992, but the true cause of his death wasn’t publicized due to the stigma of HIV/AIDS at the time. His work has greatly influenced my love of Science Fiction, and for that I am thankful.

For more information on the life of Isaac Asimov, please visit the official Wikipedia post

A Canticle for Leibowitz by Walter M. MillerA Canticle for Leibowitz by Walter M. Miller

Book Cover

A while back a co-worker of mine gave me A Canticle for Leibowitz by Walter M. Miller. It sat on a shelf for a few years until I recently got around to reading it. I didn’t really know much about the book when it was given to me, but since then I’ve seen it on a few “Best of SF” book lists. It also won the Hugo Award for best science fiction novel. There are three parts to the book, each taking place a few hundred years apart.

The setting of the first part takes begins in the 26th century. At some unspecified time in the past, the world all but destroyed in a global nuclear war. Almost all the secrets of modern technology were lost in what would later be described as a purge. The mob of humans left alive banded together to destroy all knowledge that could lead to another nuclear war. There were book burnings and hangings of scientists. The story follows group of monks that have built an abbey in the desert to house the Memorabilia as they refer to books, technical manuals, and other bits of information that are uncovered over time. Their patron is a man by the name of Leibowitz, who was hung during the purge just after the first nuclear war. (more…)

So who wants to control your own personal robot?So who wants to control your own personal robot?

How would you like to control your own personal robot to do your bidding? The new movie Surrogates, starring Bruce Willis, takes this concept to extremes. In the movie, humans link their minds to a robot and control them directly. This is a bit different than being converted to a cyborg like Ray Kurzweil predicts.

As CNN reports:

“Surrogates” director Jonathan Mostow, whose film credits include 2003’s “Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines,” said he was drawn to the concept of surrogate robots as an extension of current technology. And, he said, as he met with scientists, he became convinced that something approaching the concept could one day be a reality.

It seems like the concept of “old fashioned” humanoid robots is  finally becoming outdated. I wonder how Isaac Asimov would feel? It is one thing to boss around a robot using the Second Law of Robotics, but actually mind-melding with one, or becoming one is completely different. The main dilemma in Surrogates is that someone found a way to fry someone’s brain before they were able to jack out of the robot they were controlling. This concept is very old, dating back to the old Virtual Reality plots. I was very interested in the movie when I first saw the trailer, but after reading some lackluster reviews, I think I might just wait for DVD.

The critics could be wrong though. Do any of you think I should give it a chance?

Check out the full article via CNN for more information. I found it to be an interesting read.