The Science Fiction Review Books Anathem by Neal Stephenson – Narrated by William Dufris

Anathem by Neal Stephenson – Narrated by William Dufris

Book Cover

I usually prefer reading books, but I have about a 15 minute drive to work which over time adds up to a lot of wasted time listening to the radio. A few years ago I listened to Steven King’s Dark Tower series, which took me over a year of trips to work. After Robert Jordan died and his Wheel of Time series was finished up by Brandon Sanderson, I revisited the books I already read on audio as I didn’t want to dedicate reading time to catching up, then read the new ones. This time I wanted ONE book, not a series so I after some digging around I came across Anathem by Neal Stephenson. I’ve previously read Snow Crash, The Diamond Age, and Cryptonomicon. I really enjoyed Snow Crash and The Diamond Age, however Cryptonomicon was insanely long. I about half way through, I started to feel fatigued and found myself just looking forward to the end. Given the length of Anathem, I knew I didn’t really want to dedicate that amount of reading time to the book. I normally read about 15-20 minutes a day during my lunch break at work, so it would have taken forever for me to finish. The audiobook format seemed like a good fit. In the end, it took me about 2 months to make it through the 32 + hours.

I was very pleased with the narration by William Dufris. Each character had a distinct voice which really was beneficial because bulk of this book is dialogue. There is an intro with a spoiler warning that I didn’t bother to skip over. It mentioned that there would be just minor spoilers, of which I couldn’t remember when the time came anyway. I recommend just reading it. Each chapter starts off with a definition of a word that may or may not be an English word from our world. Some of these definitions are read by Neal Stephenson himself, and others by Oliver Wyman and Tavia Gilbert. The definitions usually set up some type of event in the chapter which breaking out to define the unfamiliar word would just bring the experience, whether reading or listening, to a stop. I saw several reviewers complain about the format of the book, or even the fact that definitions were needed. It took me a while to get used to the new words, but eventually I just took them in naturally, which was good because of the insanely long length of the book.

Neal Stephenson created a vibrant world, more detailed than just about any other standalone book I’ve read. He goes into explicit detail describing the characters, landscape, technology, history, metaphysics, and philosophy in the world of Arbre. At first I was a bit annoyed at the extremely detailed descriptions of everything, and just wanted to story to get moving along. For example, when the book first started, Stephenson seemed to spend an unusually long time describing the workings of the clock tower in Concent of Saunt Edhar (think Monastery) where the story begins. The opening is very slow and detailed, but it paid off because toward the conclusion I realized that I was attached to this little world that Stephenson created. It is hard to describe the conflicting feelings I had toward the end of the book. I wanted the mysteries to be revealed and experience the ending, but knew I’d miss listening to the book on my daily drive. I’m very glad I listened rather than read, because otherwise it might have taken me 6 months to get through it! For those reading or listening, expect the pace to pick up about 2/3rds of the way through the book (2 normal length novels) for the “action” to really pick up. That might be a turn-off for most people, but depending on how you like to read (or listen) to books, just keep that in mind.

A large portion of this book is dedicated to long philosophical “dialogues,” as the main character refers to them. These can get a bit drawn out at times, but normally push the plot along in some way, however subtle at times. I think that is why this book can be so long with not really a whole lot of plot happening. I can imagine how frustrating that could be for a reader, but since I was just listening, I found myself zoning out from time to time, not particularly caring to skip back and start the dialogue over. I seem to recall giggling at an exchange that went something like this.

Conversation, conversation….. “Oh are you engaging me in a dialogue? In that case….” where the dialogue gets more convoluted.

If you can get past the insane length and the quirky made up words, I think most people would end up liking this book. If you don’t want to learn new vocabulary that will serve no use outside of this book, you might want to pass.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please prove you are a human * Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Post

Happy Birthday Isaac AsimovHappy Birthday Isaac Asimov

Happy birthday Isaac Asimov! I started casually reading “In Memory Yet Green,” last month in my spare time. I would take it with me to places I expected to wait like the doctor’s office or something like that. It has been satisfying to finally get to know the author of my favorite science fiction series. According to this first volume of his autobiography, there is no real record of Isaac Asimov’s birthday. He was born in Petrovichi, Russia around 1920 and chose arbitrarily to celebrate his birthday on January 2nd.

Sadly, Isaac Asimov died of heart and kidney failure complications due to AIDS on April 6, 1992. He contracted HIV from a blood transfusion during a heart bypass operation in 1983. This link to HIV and AIDS wasn’t revealed until later when Janet Asimov published “It’s Been a Good Life,” in 2002.

It is a shame that such a talented author died before his time, but not before he wrote or edited over 400 books and countless essays and letters. I would have loved see how he continued his Robot and Foundation novels in the future. Hopefully I will find time to read some of his non-fiction this year, which most of his writing consists of. For a start, I received “Yours, Isaac Asimov: A Life in Letters,” for Christmas. I’m sure that it will be very interesting. If you haven’t read anything by Asimov, you should visit your local library or run a creative Google search. You’ll be in for a treat.

Robots in Time: Predator by William F. WuRobots in Time: Predator by William F. Wu

Robots in Time Predator book cover

This book is great for teens, not for adult readers or die-hard fans. I acquired this book along with about 16 Isaac Asimov classics (Foundation series, Caves of Steel, etc), otherwise I probably never would have purchased it. If you are a die-hard fan like me, you will find this book/series unbearable. The book is written for a young reader according to the author, so my reaction is to be expected. The main characters act out every single 3 law conflict over and over throughout the novel. Every situation is explained in detail with reason why Robot X can or can’t do this or that because of Law X.

For a new reader that isn’t familiar with Asimov this book would probably be very informative. If you are interested in Time travel, buy “The End of Eternity” by Isaac Asimov. If you want to read up on the Three Laws, buy “I, Robot”. If you want a combination of both for a younger reader, buy this book. I would suggest this book for readers around the age of 12-16 after they have read “I, Robot”.

Extraterrestrial Civilizations by Isaac AsimovExtraterrestrial Civilizations by Isaac Asimov

Published 39 years ago in 1979, Isaac Asimov discussed the possibilities of finding intelligent life in his book Extraterrestrial Civilizations. This has been on my reading list for quite a long time, but I just now got the notion to mark it off. Having read literally all of Asimov’s fiction, I thought it was time to read more of his non-fiction. Unwittingly, I finished this just a week or two before his birthday, which by the way was 99 years ago today!

I was thinking Extraterrestrial Civilizations would be a discussion on what civilizations might be like when if/when we discover them, or they discover us. It turned out to be more of a thought experiment, methodically laying out probabilities based on list of assumptions. Most of these assumptions were made with what scientific knowledge there was available at the time. Asimov was very careful to speckle the book with asterisks noting that if certain assumptions would change in the future, the predictions would be changed or invalidated. (more…)